COMMUNICATIVE AND PRAGMATIC FEATURES OF DIPLOMATIC DISCOURSE: A LINGUISTIC-PRAGMATIC PERSPECTIVE
Keywords:
Diplomatic Communication, Pragmatic Analysis, Politeness StrategiesAbstract
This study examines the communicative and pragmatic characteristics of diplomatic discourse, emphasizing its role in fostering international cooperation and maintaining balance in global relations. The research uses a qualitative discourse analysis framework to explore politeness strategies, hedging, and metaphorical language in official diplomatic communications. Results indicate that pragmatic elements play a vital role in achieving clarity, neutrality, and sensitivity within complex political contexts. The findings provide significant insights into how diplomatic discourse adapts to the demands of globalization and evolving communication technologies.
References
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness:
Some universals in language usage. Cambridge
University Press.
Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the Internet
(2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse:
Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In
P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and
semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). Academic Press.
Holmes, J. (2013). An introduction to
sociolinguistics (4th ed.). Routledge.
Kádár, D. Z., & Haugh, M. (2013).
Understanding politeness. Cambridge
University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we
live by. University of Chicago Press.
Leech, G. N. (2014). The pragmatics of
politeness. Oxford University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in
the philosophy of language. Cambridge
University Press.
Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in interaction: An
introduction to pragmatics. Longman.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
