TESTING RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE INTEGRATION AND KNOWLEDGE SHARING BEHAVIOR: AN ANALYTICAL STUDY OF THE OPINIONS OF THE TEACHING STAFF AT THE TECHNICAL COLLEGE / MUSAYYIB
Keywords:
knowledge integration, knowledge-sharing behaviourAbstract
The current study tests the correlation and influence relationship between the integration of knowledge (direction, exchange, socialization, comprehension) and the behavior of sharing knowledge with its dimensions (fairness, identity, enjoyment of help, openness, interest/knowledge, the behavior of sharing knowledge). Between the integration of knowledge and the behavior of knowledge-sharing, from which six sub-hypotheses emerge, and then a sample of 127 teaching staff was selected at the Technical Institute / Al-Musayyab, which is of vital and prominent importance in the field of education and knowledge and its diverse practices in creating an educated, civilized and educated generation. The data were collected through a questionnaire prepared For this purpose, 127 questionnaires were distributed to the teaching staff, 110 were retrieved, and the recovery rate was 87%. SPSS vr programs were used. 24 To extract the results of correlation and influence and test hypotheses, as the validity of the hypotheses was found in the light of the results of the statistical analysis, and a number of recommendations were reached, perhaps the most prominent of which is the existence of a vital and prominent effect of knowledge integration in the behavior of knowledge sharing.
References
Toward a knowledgebased theory of the firm," Strategic Manage. J., vol. 17, pp. 109–122, 1996b.
. Nonaka and H. Takeuchi, The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1995.
B. H. Demsetz, "The theory of the firm revisited," J. Law, Econ. Org., vol. 4, pp. 141–161, Spring 1998.
Based Firms, Eds. Berggren C., Bergek A., Bengtsson L., Hobday M., Söderlund J. Oxford University Press. New York. Berggren, C., Söderlund, S. & Andersson, C. (2001). Clients, Contractors, and Consultants, The consequences of organizational fragmentation in contemporary project environment. Project Management Journal, September, Vol. 32:3 :3948.
Berggren, C., Bergek, A., Bengtsson, L. & Söderlund, J. (2011). Knowledge integration and innovation. In Knowledge Integration and Innovation: Critical Challenges Facing International Technology
Brockman, B. K., & Morgan, R. M. (2003). The role of existing knowledge in new product innovativeness and performance. Decision Sciences, 34(2), 385–419. Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS and SIM
Bstieler, Ludwig. 2006. Trust Formation in Collaborative New Product Development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 23: 56–72.
Colquitt, J. A. 2001. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 386400.
Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Rodell, J. B., Long, D. M., Zapata, C. P., Conlon, D. E., & Wesson, M. J. 2013. Justice at the millennium, a decade later: A metaanalytic test of social exchange and affectbased perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98: 199236.
Colquitt, J. Scott, B., Judge, T., & Shaw, J. 2006. Justice and personality: Using integrative theories to derive moderators of justice effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100: 110122.
Dierkes, Berthoin Antal, J. Child, and I. Nonaka (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge (pp. 491516), New York: Oxford University Press.
Dyer, Jeffrey H., and Wujin Chu. 2003. The Role of Trustworthiness in Reducing Transaction Costs and Improving Performance: Empirical Evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea. Organization Science 14: 57–68.
Enberg, C. & Lindkvist, L., Tell F. (2006). Exploring the dynamics of knowledge integration. Acting and interacting in project teams. Management learning Vol.37 (2) : 143 165.
Enberg, C. (2007). Knowledge Integration in Product Development Projects, doctoral thesis. Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping University,
Grant, R.M. (1996) Towards a knowledge based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal. Vol. 17 (special issue) pp.10912
Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C. Y., & Wei, K.K. (2005). Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 113–143.
Lynham, S. A., (2002) The general method of theorybuilding research in applied disciplines, Advances in Developing Human Resources 4(3), 221241
Marjchrzak, A., Cooper, L., & Neece, O., (2004) Knowledge reuse for innovation. Management Science, 50(2), 174188.
McLeod, Laurie, and Stephen G. MacDonell. 2011. Factors that affect software systems development project outcomes: A survey of research. ACM Computing Surveys 43: 1–56.
Meyer, John P., Natalie J. Allen, and Catherine A. Smith. 1993. Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a threecomponent conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology 78: 538–51.
Nonaka, "A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation," Org. Sci., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 14–37, 1994.
Nonaka, I., and Takeuchi, H., (1995) The knowledgecreating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., and Byosière, P., (2001) A theory of organizational knowledge creation: Understanding the dynamic process of creating knowledge. In M.
Rupp, D. E., Shao, R., Jones, K. S., & Liao, H. 2014. The utility of a multifoci approach to the study of organizational justice: A metaanalytic investigation into the consideration of normative rules, moral accountability, bandwidthfidelity, and social exchange. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123: 159185.
Turner, John C., Michael A. Hogg, Penelope J. Oakes, Stephen D. Reicher, and Margaret S. Wetherell. 1987. Rediscovering the Social Group: A SelfCategorization Theory. New York: Basil Blackwell.
Zidane, Youcef J. T., Bassam A. Hussein, Johann Gudmundsson, and Anandasivakumar Ekambaram. 2016. Categorization of organizational factors and their impact on project performance. ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences 226: 162–69
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
