ROLE OF DIGITAL TOMOSYNTHESIS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF EARLY BREAST CANCER (LITERATURE REVIEW)
Keywords:
methods, capabilitiesAbstract
Among oncological diseases, breast cancer (BC) in women occupies a leading place throughout the world. There have been advances in its treatment, but early diagnosis of breast cancer is limited by the capabilities of X-ray mammography and ultrasound and therefore often requires additional methods for examining the mammary glands
References
Gazhonova V.E., Efremova M.P. Potential of ultrasound tomography in predicting the course of breast cancer (BC) – molecular classification of BC. Povolzhsky Oncological Bulletin. 2016; 24 (2): 26-32.
Korzhenkova G.P., Dolgushin B.I.. Experience in using digital mammography. Tumors of the female reproductive system. 2011; 1:37–40.
Labazanova P.G., Rozhkova N.I., Burdina I.I., Zapirova S.B., Mazo M.L., Mikushin S.Yu. and others. Mammographic density and the risk of developing breast cancer. A look at the history of the study of the issue. REJR 2020; 10 (2): 205-222.
Pasynkov D.V., Egoshin I.A., Kolchev A.A., Klyushkin I.V., Pasynkova O.O. The effectiveness of a computer analysis system for mammograms in the diagnosis of breast cancer variants that are difficult to detect with screening mammography. REJR 2019; 9 (2): 107-118
Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68:394-424.
Gilbert FJ, Tucker L, Gillan MG, Willsher P, Cooke J, Duncan KA et al. Accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Depicting Breast Cancer Subgroups in a UK Retrospective Reading Study (TOMMY Trial). Radiology. 2015; 277(3): 697-706.
Dromain C., Thibault F., Diekmann F., Fallenberg EM, Jong RA, Koomen . M., Hendrick ER, Tardivon A., Toledano A. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results of a multireader , multicase study. Breast Cancer Res . 2012; 14: R94: 1– 18 .
Duggan MA, Anderson WF, Altekruse S, Penberthy L, Sherman ME The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program and Pathology: Towards Strengthening the Critical Relationship. Am J Surg Pathol . 2016; 40(12): e94–e102.
Jochelson MS, Dershaw D., Sung JS, Heerdt AS, Thoenton C., Moskowitz CS, Ferrara J., Morris EA Bilateral contrast-enhanced dual-Energy digital mammography: feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma. Radiology. 2013; 266(3):743–751
Kaiser J. Cancer. Cholesterol forges link between obesity and breast cancer // Science. – 2013. – Vol. 342. – No. 6162. – P. 1028.
Keen JD, Keen JM, Keen JE Utilization of ComputerAided Detection for Digital Screening Mammography in the United States, 2008 to 2016. J Am Coll Radiol . 2018; 15(1 Pt A): 44-48.
Lehman CD, Wellman RD, Buist DS, Kerlikowske K., Tosteson ANA, Miglioretti DL Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection. JAMA Intern Med. 2015; 175(11): 1828-1837
Lobbes MBI, Lalji UC, Nelemans PJ, Houben I., Smidt ML, Heuts E., Vries B., Wildberger JE, BeetsTan RG The quality of tumor size assessment by contrastenhanced spectral mammography and the benefit of additional breast MRI. J. Cancer. 2015; 6(2):144–150
Masud R., Al-Rei M., Lokker C. Computer-Aided Detection for Breast Cancer Screening in Clinical Settings: Scoping Review [published correction appears in JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Aug 21;7(3 ):e 15799]. JMIR Med Inform. 2019;7(3 ):e 12660.
Nelson ER, Wardell SE, Jasper JS et al. 27-Hydroxycholesterol links hypercholesterolemia and breast cancer pathophysiology // Science. – 2013. – Vol. 342. – No. 6162. – P. 1094–1098.
Pasynkov DV, Egoshin IA, Kolchev A . A. , Kliouchkin IV, Pasynkova ABOUT . ABOUT . The value of computer aided detection system in breast cancer difficult to detect at screening mammography. REJR. 2019;
Thigpen D., Kappler A., Brem R. The Role of Ultrasound in Screening Dense Breasts—A Review of the Literature and Practical Solutions for Implementation. Diagnostics (Basel). 2018; 8(1):20
Freer PE Mammographic breast density: impact on breast cancer risk and implications for screening. Radiographics . 2015; 35 (2): 302–315.
Warner M., Gustafsson JA On estrogen, cholesterol metabolism, and breast cancer // The New England Journal of Medicine. – 2014. – Vol. 370. – No. 6. – P. 572–573
Woolston C. Breast cancer // Nature. – 2015. – Vol. 527. – No. 7578. – S101.
Weigel S., Heindel W., Heidrich J., Hense HW, Heidinger O. Digital mammography screening: sensitivity of the program dependent on breast density. Eur Radiol . 2017; 27:2744.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
