EVALUATION OF COST APPROACH FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF EMPLOYEES OF THE GENERAL COMPANY FOR LEATHER INDUSTRIES

Authors

  • THAR SAADOON SHNAISHEL University Of Summer
  • Qassim Mahal Herez University Of Summer
  • Ahmed Mohammed Hamzah University Of Summer

Keywords:

evaluation, costs accountancy, cost approach T.C

Abstract

The aim of the research is to evaluate the cost approaches (Target costing, Activity Based Costing, Attributes Based Costing) (Target costing, Activity Based Costing, Attributes Based Costing), by revealing the strengths and weaknesses from the viewpoint of the employees of the General Company for Leather Industries and the researcher has prepared a questionnaire consisting of (22) paragraphs that represent the common characteristics and features among the cost approaches including (cost reduction, pricing quality, competitive advantage, product quality, and raising efficiency) within a list that includes the three entries and their validity and consistency were achieved, and were applied to an intentional sample of (50) of the company’s workers and the results are : 1. The Target costing approach gets first place with (15) high strength points and (7) medium strength. 2. The Activity Based Costing approach gets the second place, with (15) high strength points and (7) medium strength. 3. The Attributes Based Costing approach is ranked third, with (13) high strength points and (9) medium strength points. There are no weaknesses for all stages. 4. The differences were significant according to the sex variable with respect to the cost approach (ABC), and were not significant for the other two variables (scientific qualification, and service in years). 5. The relationships between the cost approaches were significant and ranged between (0,479 - 0,657). The TC explained the percentage of variation in (ABC) and (ABCII). The researcher has concluded with recommendations and suggestions , most importantly to open rehabilitation studies for the workers in the company and working on the integration of three approaches.

References

-Barfield ,etal(2005) : Cost Accounting ,Traditions and luorations , 5thed . U.S.A , South Western.

Walker ,M, (1999) : Attributes Based Costing for Decision Making , Management Accounting Magazine ,VOL , NO.6

-Klausmieir ,H,J(1975): Learning Human Abilities , New York, publishers ,Inc

-Haknsson ,H,& Lind ,J (2007) :Accounting in an Inter-organiziational Setting , Handbook of Management Accounting research , VOL 11.P 885-902

--Blandell ,R & Dais ,M.C.(2000): Evaluation Methods for non .Experimental data Fiscal Studies . VOL21 , NO4

-Goldthrope ,J,H,(2001) : Caustion statistics and Sociology European- Sciological Review, VOL17 ,NO1

-Feil, Patrick &etal (2004) Japenese Target Costing : A Historical Perspective , International Jourual of Strategic cost Management .

Weiss ,C.H, (1998): Evaluation ,2nded. New Jersey , Princi Hal

Rayburu , Letricia , G:(1998) : Priciple of cost Accounting using Management approach, 4thed , Bosto ,Irwin

Downloads

Published

2022-07-06

How to Cite

THAR SAADOON SHNAISHEL, Qassim Mahal Herez, & Ahmed Mohammed Hamzah. (2022). EVALUATION OF COST APPROACH FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF EMPLOYEES OF THE GENERAL COMPANY FOR LEATHER INDUSTRIES. World Economics and Finance Bulletin, 12, 15-31. Retrieved from https://scholarexpress.net/index.php/wefb/article/view/1122

Issue

Section

Articles